Focus
Three layers a better model makes more valuable, not obsolete.
We do not invest in AI broadly. We invest in three specific layers where a more capable model is a tailwind for the company that owns the layer, and a threat only to whoever merely wraps it. Each has its own economics, its own durable assets, and its own bar.
01
Vertical Intelligence
An autonomous worker for one regulated job: medical coding, claims, underwriting. It does not sell software to the team. It is the team, priced against payroll.
The regulated part is the point. Regulation is what turns a workflow into a system of record, an approval into a moat, and an outcome into something someone must be accountable for. The company that carries that accountability with no human in the loop is priced against the payroll of the function, and every model release lowers its cost of goods.
- We look for
- One regulated function, run end to end, priced per decision
- We avoid
- Co-pilots, point features inside the incumbent's tool, horizontal agents
- Durable assets
- The system of record, outcome data, regulatory standing
- Representative
- Harvey, end to end legal AI
02
Physical AI
The layer every autonomous machine runs on: simulation, perception, data, fleet operations. We do not pick the winning robot. We own the ground all of them stand on.
Every autonomous machine, whatever it looks like, needs the same things underneath it: a place to train and test, data with physics in it, a way to prove it is safe, and a way to run a fleet once it ships. Those layers concentrate while the machines fragment. We back the layers.
- We look for
- Simulation, perception data, validation and fleet software that many programs run on
- We avoid
- Single-robot bets, hardware without a data flywheel, anything sold to a military buyer
- Durable assets
- Edge-case data, the validation record, the toolchain integration
- Representative
- Foxglove, data and observability for robotics
03
Agentic Commerce
As agents start to buy on our behalf, every purchase needs identity, authorization, and settlement. Own that layer and you hold a toll on the category, not a feature inside it.
When software buys on a person's behalf, every party needs a new kind of trust: who this agent is, what it may spend, who is liable when it is wrong, and how the money moves. The company that answers those questions for both sides of the transaction earns a toll on the category. The assistant that does the shopping is the model's job, not a company.
- We look for
- Identity, authorization, settlement and risk rails that both sides integrate
- We avoid
- Shopping assistants, checkout wrappers, single-platform plugins
- Durable assets
- The mandate record, the risk data, network standing on both sides
- Representative
- Skyfire, identity and payments for AI agents
The common property
One test, three layers.
The three look different from the outside: a claims department, a warehouse robot program, a payment network. Underneath they pass the same test. In each, the capability is a commodity input, the value sits in the record, the data, the standing and the rails the input has to pass through, and a better model widens the margin of whoever owns them. That is the whole reason these three and not others.